Archetype of the SaboteurTony Crisp |
||||
|
We all have something of a saboteur working in our life somewhere. It can be as subtle as the beliefs you hold, preventing a certain direction in life; or it can be a full time action destroying your own best interests. I remember while at college with other adult students a woman telling me several times that women were not allowed - in a male dominated society - to do certain things. She was in her fifties and said that for instance in her youth women were not allowed to work. This struck me as some sort of story she was telling herself as my mother, nearly three decades older than her, had worked ever since I was born. I can't remember ever hearing my mother saying she wasn't allowed to do things. So here we have a solid belief that stands as a block to that woman's expression.
The sabotage the man was undertaking might be expressesd in another way by attempts to ruin othe rpeople's lives by spreading rumours or directly attacking or damaging a relatiosnip they are in. And the saboteur in us is an influence leading us to constantly complain. If we have enough excuses lined up, it will enable us always to squirm out of making any creative changes in our life or in the world. As can be seen, the saboteur hides behind a variety of guises, self preservation being one - if I don't stick my neck out I wont lose my head. The woman mentioned was probably using her saboteur as a way of avoiding action in which she might have felt she would fail. If so then it would have been a protection against failure. The man's saboteur was an expression of his misguided anger. Another source of energy might be that of living by certain moral guidelines, and so putting oneself beyond the involvement that would lead to opportunity. Modesty could be another way of doing this. By maintaining that we are not worthy or capable, we avoid the challenges, and lose the excuses that we gain by being modest, or through being depressed or anxious. Through this we may avoid growing into a more positive and active person because it is 'safer' to remain in our own self destructive habits of thought or feeling. Recognising the saboteur brings an enormous change. Then we not only gain insight into our own internal 'terrorists', but we can also see them at work in those around us. That is the positive side of the archetype; the insights gained from its awareness of the powers directed against our personal unfoldment. Useful questions are: Am I in any way aware of how my saboteur works? Do I have the courage to step out of the defenses I build and face the possibilities of failure, of rejection or personal insight? What action of the saboteur can I see in those around me, and how does that apply to me? |
Archetype of the ShapeshifterTony Crisp |
||||
|
In Western society there is little understanding of the power and influence of shapeshifter. In fact most people only meet the negative aspect of this flow of influence in their life. The source of the shapeshifter power is not in its ability to move between different guises. That is only the external expression of something very profound. Form is only one polarity of our existence. At the other pole is formlessness, the spirit without physical shape, the void of Buddhism that is nothing but holds all possibility within it. As we mature and realise these paradoxical opposites of our nature, and as we identify less with the form we have as a body, the power of shapeshifter comes more fully into our experience.
However, if we are to look at what it is to be a full human being, then we must look beyond the polarities of form and formless. We are also, in the structure and development of our very body, everything from a ting group of cells as seen just after conception, through a plant like growth, into fish and animal form, Our brain too carries this heritage of the past, having at least three levels, the human, the ape or mammalian brain underlying the human, and beneath them both the R or reptilian brain. All of these many forms of life ar within us, and as we are liberated from complete identification with our present human form and presonality, we inherit this wider wealth of being. Or they can polarise on the side of the formless and exist as a type of ascetic not forming links with the everyday world, and remaining detached from it. The balance produces that fully formed and mature man or woman who loves but not in a possessive way; who builds and creates, but is not egoistically tied to their work; who lives, and yet is somehow a lens for something more than human to shine through. Useful questions are: Am I identified so fully with my physical looks and bodily shape that I cannot recognise the formless in me? Is the formless a reality to me, and does it release me from full identification with my physical life? Where do I stand in the balance between form and formless? |
Archetype of the ManadalaTony Crisp |
|||||||
|
If one could produce a graphic image of the whole of human nature, many different forms might be integrated within an overall shape, such as a circle or square. Also, if it were possible to have a visual presentation of a person's inner world of mind, weaknesses, strengths, order, confusion, and quality, each person would appear differently. Some would be internally jumbled, divided and ugly; others symmetrical, integrated and beautiful.
|
|||||||
Tony's in print Books in the UK or USA Books - Stories - Poems - Articles/Features - Links - One Stop Shop - Home
|