Posts Tagged ‘origins of consciousness’
Levels of Awareness in Waking and Dreaming
There is an immense amount of obscure writing in connection with words such as spiritual, consciousness, God, and death. However, most of us come back to the fact that everyday life confronts us with the most observable experience of reality that we have. Fortunately, if we carefully examine what we experience every day, much of the mystery surrounding the words mentioned disappears.
If we start with the word consciousness or awareness, we can begin to open the book of our own life experience. Daily we pass through an extraordinary change that we often take so much for granted we miss the wonder of it. The change occurs between sleeping and waking. For most of us being awake is when we most fully feel ourselves. Compared with this sleeping is a period during which we lose any focused awareness of being an individual, and we sink into what is generally called unconsciousness — the lack of personal awareness.
This swing between waking and sleeping can be seen as the extremes within the possibilities of our experience. Sleeping and waking are the polarities, the North and South Poles of what we can confront. In quite a real sense we can say there is nothing beyond what is included in those polarities. For without consciousness there is nothing.
Obviously that is a very general statement and needs further explanation. So to start with let me give you an example. When I was a youth I met a man who quite subtly led me to listen to music in a way that I had never done before. He played a piece of Beethoven and said that some people believed they could hear several themes playing at any one time. He asked me how many I could hear. I listened carefully and thought I could hear three or perhaps four. He then played Beethoven’s pastoral symphony and asked me to tell him when I thought the storm was approaching.
These two exercises helped me to listen to music in a new way and began my appreciation for the classics, something that I had not done previously. It also showed me that things existed that I had not been aware of. The music had been there, and I had heard it before, but I had never known there were several themes playing at once. I had never listened carefully to the music.
I use that example as an analogy of the way we live our life. There is so much of our experience that we do not “listen to carefully” and so do not appreciate its depth or possibilities. There are many aspects of waking life that this applies to, but it is particularly relevant to sleep. This may seem like a strange statement because in sleep we lose awareness, so how can we more fully appreciate it?
Of course, one of the well-known ways of discovering what lies within the obscure depths of sleep is to explore the resources of one’s dreams. When this is done the apparently black depths of sleep begin to reveal an amazing life and energy. Light is taken into the darkness. Things become visible that were hidden. What was unconscious begins to become known. The huge area of our experience that seemed to be a blank gains life and substance. Then the unconscious is recognised as an area as vast and varied as the physical world.
However, it has to be remembered that dreams occur when our core self is almost awake. During sleep the core of our being dips deep into what we call unconsciousness or ‘the unconscious’. Several times during sleep our core rises from those depths almost to the point of waking. At that point we dream. In a dream, deeper levels of our being express in the imagery and sensations of our waking experience. They express in the images and experiences we have gathered through our senses while awake, and are largely culturally programmed. It is only when we break through the dream images and touch the forces those images portray that we begin to move into the unconscious. This is explained more fully in How it Flows and Answer to Critics
The picture on the right graphically illustrates what it is like to break through surface appearances and enter into the formless worlds of experience contained in our unconsciousness.
When this happens we begin to meet the cosmic forces that form our being and the universe.
In this way, the organic, cellular and other ‘life’ processes that are usually unknown and unconscious are met. Focussed consciousness can dive all the way down through all the levels of being and know them.
The Polarities of Existence
I want to bring the word “natural” in here because it is relevant to what is being explained. If we see animals as examples of what is natural, or what happens in nature without human intervention, then we could say that it is not natural to have one’s appendix taken out when it is inflamed. It is not natural to have breast implants. It is not natural to have vaccinations against disease. But these things are all options we are capable of, along with the countless other things that humans do because they are possible. So although animals do not spend time examining their dreams, it is possible for us to do so, and thereby expand our awareness of who we are and what the possibilities of our existence are. Perhaps it was not natural for human beings to travel to the North and South Pole’s, or to journey into space; but by doing so we have enlarged our awareness of the environment and the cosmos in which we live.
There are, of course, other ways in which we can explore the polarities of our experience. Meditation, and the use of certain drugs, enables people to explore areas of experience that do not occur “naturally”. For instance, some forms of meditation enable the practitioner to enter the condition of sleep while maintaining a certain amount of critical awareness, as happens in lucid dreaming. This really is a voyage of exploration, and is different to what happens when a person explores a dream. Exploring a dream brings contents of the unconscious into waking experience. Meditation and lucidity enables a personal dive into levels of awareness that are usually cloaked in unconsciousness. Perhaps this can be likened to the first humans who dived under the sea with a submarine and began to personally witness the immense range and variety of life that exists under the surface. See LSD Hypnosis and Dreams
But it has to be mentioned that the imagery of dreams and lucid fantasy are still almost at the level of waking.
Almost immediately after Albert Hoffman discovered LSD in 1943, it was used for psychological research and psychotherapy. During that period of intense research and therapeutic use, huge areas of the unconscious became available for exploration and mapping. As with meditation, the person’s conscious sense of self could travel in areas that were usually blanketed by the fog of sleep. The human experience behind such obscure words as spirit and God became available to the West for analysis and study – although Eastern explorers had done an excellent job centuries before. The depths and heights of what is usually unconscious within us revealed worlds completely different to what we know during waking life. Those worlds are no less real than the world of our conscious personality. They are in fact a balancing polarity to what we know and experience in our daily life. (1) See: The Mind Bomb.
From the research mentioned it was seen that in waking life we generally have a sense of ourselves as distinct from anybody else. Thus your memories and experiences seem completely separated from those of another person. We refer to this personal and unique set of experiences and responses as, “Me” — or “I”. When the researchers examined the experiences of people exploring their deep unconscious, it was seen that this sense of self gradually diminishes. There are levels of this experience that can be likened to what was said about the polarities of experience. At one end of the polarity is focused self-awareness. At the other end is an ocean of awareness without any focused sense of self. This ocean of consciousness that is at the core of our being is what has been called God in other cultures or Nirvana. In India it has been described as Sat-Chit-Ananda – Being-Consciousness-Bliss. When we discover it as the centre of ourselves it is no longer seen as exterior or distant. But in waking life where we lack awareness of it we see it either as non-existent or as separate and distant. See: Realms of the Human Unconscious by Stanislav Grof.
But many people in the west have an image of God as a sort of great man in the sky; that is because the Catholic church has presented it as such an image, and it has been painted over and over again. But the Christian religion was an outcrop from the Hebrew view of God, which was Ain Soph – the Unknowable God. This was because the creative force was ‘Everything’ and so could not be presented as a thing, such as a man. So, I am supposing the Catholic church purposely changed that. See Criticism – Answers To – Big Bang and God are the Same
One interesting part of this exploration of the depths of human consciousness is that if you go deep enough you arrive back at what we call the external or physical world. The formless and the formed are seen to be different ends of the same thing. The ancient symbol of the snake with its tail in its mouth illustrates this closed system. Quantum physics, digging deep into the world of form, is arriving back to what mystics of all ages have discovered in their inner depths. See Tao of Physics by Fritjof Capra
This leads us to an extremely important point – what we are not capable of being personally aware of does not exist for us. In a very real way nothing exists for us unless we can be aware of it in some way. There is nothing outside of consciousness. Or to put it another way, without personal awareness nothing exists for us. Therefore the polarities of our awareness hold the whole cosmos of experience for us. If most of that lies in darkness in our ‘unconscious’ then much of what we hold as a possibility remains unknown. See: The Dancing Wu Li Masters.
The Remarkable Roots of Being
Seen as a circle in which there are polarities of focussed awareness at one end and unfocused sentience at the other, helps us to realise that what occurs when self awareness plumbs the depths of its source – the unconscious – is remarkable. The roots of our being lie in the mysterious depths of subatomic particles. At this very moment you contain in yourself that level of existence. It is also a fact that what you are has emerged from, and is intricately enmeshed in, the universe and its origins. Also, you are what you are because life on this planet emerged and you hold in yourself in your very genes, cells, organs and overall structure, the full history of that emergence. So diving below the level of waking awareness is an entry into the most profoundly amazing discovery of what you are and how you have come into being. There is not space in this short feature to spell that out, but such books as The Holographic Universe and Realms of the Human Unconscious, vastly extend what is being said here.
So, with a little reflection it can be seen that each of us experience these polarities every day. As our sense of self diminishes we become unconscious. In the depths of sleep the self we know in waking does not exist — or at least, it is greatly diminished. But these areas of human experience can be known if we learn to “listen carefully”. This is what some forms of mental and emotional discipline helps us to do.
Anyone who seriously undertakes this voyage into what was previously unconscious meets phenomena that at first seem strange, or sometimes even frightening. Remember that usually we enter this realm of the unconscious in the form of sleep and dreams, and in most cases dreams use our cultural and everyday imagery and experience. So our focused self-awareness is guarded from a direct confrontation with these phenomena. The nearest most of us get to experiencing life under the surface is when we recall a dream. And in fact a dream illustrates this first level of what we meet. See Jesse Watkins Enlightenment
But there are difficulties in meeting our larger self
The human personality – the You that you call yourself, with a name, is only a tiny thing. It is moved and tossed around by all manner of drives, ambitions, emotions, fears, temptations, worries, love and desire with its pains and hopes; it is something we take so seriously and get carried away into awful situations; we take many sorts of pain killers to deal with ourselves. Things such as alcohol, coffee, medical drugs and street drugs, and yet we are still prone to break down, as can be seen by the number of people who need antidepressants or are totally lost in themselves. See Programmed
And a lot of the pain and the mental misery are largely because we put so much trust in what we think and feel. We are totally identified with it. Yet thoughts are simple photocopies of reality and are never the real things. They are just sounds we make into words to help us move around a strange and confusing world. And feelings to are simply a response to what we meet. Do you believe the person you think of is them? It can only ever be your own thoughts and feelings about them.
We are small because we know nothing about who we are and how we came to be – except of course in the words we have been taught are really the truth. We do not know anything about the mass of things that keep is alive – except what we have read, yet more words. We are largely unconscious of what makes our heart beat, and all the millions of things that life behind our existence does, so we are moved by whatever moves us – whatever that is – childhood fears and social programming, or haunted by the past.
Also as we begin to meet the Hugeness that we are we often react to it with fear or panic. So we dream or being attacked by aliens or frightening creatures. If we realise that they are things we have created with fear we will pass on.
We are many things and are unaware of our own complexity
We are probably all acquainted now with looking at the instruments on the dashboard of a car. On such a panel we can see an indication of the speed, of the amount of fuel, and of the temperature of the water cooling system. When we look at any of these gauges we are not of course directly aware of the hot water, of the amount of fuel, or of the engines revolutions. We are only seeing a graphic display of what is taking place in unseen parts of the car.
Our body and mind are far more complex than any car. There is far more that goes on in the hidden places of our being than ever goes on in an engine. But dreams perform the same function as the gauges on the dashboard. They illustrate processes that are going on in the depths of our body and mind — and in fact often in the very deepest places of the unconscious. As with the gauges, we are not directly experiencing the processes displayed in images and drama. What we are witnessing is a process that puts into imagery, into emotions and drama, things that in themselves may be quite formless, that may never previously have come near to verbal definition or conscious conceptualisation. The word imagine has its root in the word image. We literally put into images those things that lie beyond our usual senses in the formless and timeless regions of our being.
So this image making process, this myth forming creative activity of dreaming, forms environments and experiences that seem as convincing as waking life. If we find ourselves in the midst of a dream, or in the midst of this virtual reality without understanding how it works, we may be completely immersed in its apparent reality. I suppose this might be likened to looking at our hand, then looking at it with a microscope, and then with an electron microscope. There are worlds within worlds and you hold them all within you and can be conscious of. See Summing Up – Jesse Watkins Enlightenment
For many people, especially those who have stumbled upon this inner journey without guidance or understanding, or have been “opened” to it through the use of a drug, shock or mental illness, this is as far as they can travel. They become lost in the imagery and the emotions, the conflict and fears, the subtle and enchanting glamour or illusion of this first level. Or they may lose some of their mental balance, haunted by what is revealed or released into consciousness, as often happens to people who frequently take mind expanding drugs without the skills to deal with what they confront. They release these aspects or ‘creatures of the unconscious without having learned the psychotherapeutic tools or personal disciplines and understanding to integrate what they meet. They are then haunted by what emerged.
Many myths throughout the ages have illustrated this part of the journey in various ways. One Arabic myth instructs the traveller to use a sword to cut down whatever appears in front of them, even if it seems to be their mother or father. Perhaps this is a bit harsh, but it does point to the fact that at this level things are not what they may appear. Neither are they complete illusions. They are images and environments portraying something. The aim is to break through the surface level to the source from which they emerge. The point being that if you can destroy or cut through an image you are still not meeting its source. The core self is indestructible. But whenever we dream its images are not like real life. Because a dream is nothing like outer life where things could hurt you, but is an image like on a cinema screen so that even if a gun is pointed at you and fired it can do no damage – except if you run in fear. So all the things that scare you are simply your own fears projected onto the screen of your sleeping mind.
The Indian sage Ramakrishna says of his own journey beyond forms, “Tota Puri taught me to detach my mind from all objects and to plunge it into the heart of the Atman (core self). But despite all my efforts, I could not cross the realm of name and form and lead my spirit to the Unconditional state. I had no difficulty in detaching my mind from all objects with the one exception of the too familiar form of the radiant Mother, the essence of pure knowledge, who appeared before me as a living reality. I said to Tota Puri in despair, ‘It is no good, I shall never succeed in lifting my spirit to the “Unconditioned” state and find myself face to face with the Atman.’
He replied severely, ‘What! You say you cannot? You must!’ Looking about him, he found a piece of glass. He took it and stuck the point between my eyes, saying, ‘Concentrate your mind on that point.’ Then I began to meditate with all my might, and as soon as the gracious form of the Divine Mother appeared I used my discrimination as a sword, and I clove Her in two. The last barrier fell and my spirit immediately precipitated itself beyond the plane of the ‘conditional’, and I lost myself in Samadhi (unconditioned bliss).
However, for many people there is an enormous amount to be experienced and used at this level, existing as it does amidst the images of the ‘psychic’ realm, and expressing in a sort of more fluid mirroring of the three dimensions, time and space limited experience we meet through our senses and body. This is the world the psychic works in when they extend their perceptions to ‘communicate with the dead’, tell us about our life situation without us giving clues, and having glimpses of the future.
In attempting to understand these experiences, it must be remembered that beyond the images of a person, of a situation, of voices heard, in the way dreams present things, lies a more formless dimension of experience. It is one where the boundaries of personality and distance, time and space break down. So for many people, it is an easier task to look at this formless dimension through the translating instrument of dream image formation, and see people, places, environments, or hear voices talking to them.
The Guardian of the Threshold
This breaking through into other dimensions of experience, which occurs in successful dream insights, mediation and in some facilitated drug use, takes one to the next level of the unconscious.
In one of the old western traditions in which people were guided to make this journey, the illusionary imagery and environments were called the psychic world, as described above. One was warned that at some point you would meet The Dweller or Guardian of the Threshold. Sometimes this was illustrated as a shadowy and perhaps frightening figure, the sort we often meet in scary dreams. If you could face the Dweller without running away, the realm you enter beyond the Guardian was described as the meeting with all the forces you had perhaps unwittingly released or created in the past. They are the factors or experiences out of which the waking experience of your life has been woven. In the past this was called one’s fate, kismet, or karma. Today we tend to think of it as the many influences carried from genes, birth and early childhood, that shape the way we respond in our daily life; in other words, inherited tendencies, cultural programming and psychological traumas. But the Guardian also represented influences from prior to ones present birth. See Reincarnation
Not only is it a guardian, but also, if you meet it without fear and pass the tests it presents you with, it is also a guide and companion on the journey. If you meet this by actually facing the ‘scary monster’ of a nightmare, a similar thing happens – you meet forces that arise from the past and shape your present personality.
Any deeper exploration of the unconscious shows that it is not simply one’s infancy and its problems that we face. There are influences streaming from the long past through the body that we have inherited. There are the family influences and massive inputs from the culture we were born into, and also other intangible forces playing upon our life. As we cut through the images and drama of the dream creator, we begin to discover and gain insights into this incredible process of creation that forms and guides our life. See The Conjuring Trick
The image of Frankenstein’s creation illustrates the Guardian of the Threshold very clearly. The Guardian, like Frankenstein’s creation, is made of many different people or bodies. We face, in the Guardian, what we have created in our long past; the many personalities assumed, and lives lived, by our core self. See: Archetype of the Shadow.
Light of My Life
This world of the formative, of the archetypes, of the physiological and the cosmic processes — even the intelligences – that are the creative matrix out of which we have arisen, is strange and wonderful. Very often the traveller has to lose a great deal before they can safely explore this realm with awareness. The reason for this is quite simple. Identity, the ego, what one calls self, is an extremely new and vulnerable thing in terms of evolution. It might be likened to the fragile filament in an electric light bulb. When the current is switched on the filament glows brightly, and we can liken this to personal awareness. The current passing through us is the air, water and food that flow through in an almost continuous stream to form our energy. Whether we consider the electric light bulb, or our own sense of self, behind the existence of both, immense activities take place making them possible. The light bulb needs a great deal of cable, switching gear, and some sort of generator. Our personal existence needs a great deal more. The whole universe lies behind the ‘light’ of our self awareness. Without the cosmos we do not exist. Without the sun and the earth we do not exist. Without the bacteria and processes of plant and animal life on our planet we do not exist. Without other human beings who have taught us language and perform the constant background and foreground to our life, we do not exist.
However, this fragile thing we call self often builds powerful defences or boundaries to protect it from knowing its dependence upon the forces forming it. These defences often show themselves in rigid beliefs, in a fog of ignorance, in emotional outbursts against anything that might be felt to threaten, and also of course in the many ways in which we use drugs such as alcohol, medications and nicotine to deaden our sense perceptions of what is taking place around and within us. We do this because our ego is fragile and vulnerable. We may also do it because the journey into the unconscious diminishes the sense of self, and this can be threatening. It can be felt as a form of death, or an experience of breaking open. The boundaries that were so necessary at a certain stage of our growth fall away. The journey into that more inclusive polarity of our being is actually a form of growth, of greater maturity, of a meeting with something more permanent than the fragile ego.
Another way of looking at the business of defences against a widening awareness of oneself is to see all of it as a process of growth. Perhaps we cannot let go of our defended relationship with our identity while we still feel vulnerable or insecure. Perhaps the change comes about naturally once we feel confident enough to let down our defences.
If you have managed to enter this level of experience for any length of time you will be confronted by an enormous paradox. This is, in essence, no different to the paradox we face every day in experiencing focused individual identity, and the loss of that identity in sleep. What we meet when we pass beyond the dream stage in which everything is represented as images external to us, is a vast ocean of mind or consciousness in which all that has lived exists. It exists as an unseparated part of the ocean of awareness — yet at the same time it can manifest independently and as a separate identity. This applies to oneself also. You sense yourself as having no real separate existence from what lives and knows itself in all things. Yet at the same time you experience your own separated identity. This is a difficult paradox, and human language tends to express things as either this, or that. Things cannot be both things at once. But in this journey to one’s own centre such separation is transcended. You experience a sense of things that transcend the limitations of time and space. Things can be here and there at the same time.
The old Newtonian physics has never included mind or consciousness in its equations. As the atom was the fundamental particle, and the atom was a physical object, it was seen that there could be nothing beyond the body, its molecules and atoms. Therefore personal awareness was a trick played by the play of chemicals, and organs in the body. As for consciousness surviving death, it was seen as a childish superstition created by weak minds to deal with fear of death.
But the new physics, quantum physics, has since its earliest days included mind and consciousness in its concepts. It has had to because from the earliest days of quantum experiments two unimaginable phenomena were unveiled. Irish physicist John Stewart Bell put forward a quantum theorem that has revolutionised the way reality is considered. In brief, the theorem states that when two sub-microscopic particles are split and moved to a distance from each other, the action on, or of, particle ‘A’, is instantaneously reproduced with particle ‘B’. This interaction does not rely on any known link or communication and is considered to stand above normal physical laws of nature, as it is faster than light.
Faster Than Light
Prior to such findings it was thought nothing could transcend the speed of light. Nick Herbert, in an interview published in High Frontiers writes, ‘THERE ARE LOTS OF THINGS that are being kept from the public as far as the subjects of physics and consciousness are concerned. Bell’s Theorem was proved in 1964, and it is still not taught in physics classes, and you don’t hear it on your science news programs. A theorem is a proof, and no one has found a flaw in this theorem. It’s such a simple proof that a high school kid can understand it. So physicists can understand it. They have various ways of trying to ignore it, but it can’t be refuted because it’s so simple.’
The second finding that transformed our understanding of life and the universe is that an electron can be either a particle or a wave like energy. The change occurs when a human observes it. If we do not observe it an electron remains as an energy form. If we observe it a transformation occurs and it changes into a particle. This locks human consciousness into the very fundamental workings of the deepest levels of our body and the universe. In fact quantum physicists have said we are co-creators because consciousness alters ‘reality’.
To quote Gary Zukav, ‘Quantum mechanics is THE theory. It has explained everything from subatomic particles to transistors to stellar energy. It has never failed. It has no competition.’ The implications of the theorem are enormous. Something can be in two places at once. Apparently distant objects, or people, are intricately linked in an immediate way. There is no separate existence as we previously thought. Our view of the world is not one supported by the facts of physics. Time and space are transcended. David Bohm, an eminent physicist, goes as far as to say that all things in our observable universe are inextricable linked. Nothing has separate existence. Also we all have infinite potential
When we personally meet this level of experience, when we transcend our awareness of separateness, the experiences we have gathered through our everyday life are gradually transformed. They shift, wherever possible, into concepts or insights that approach the universal or timeless and unchanging. Just as our physical body is formed by the continuous partaking of food water and air, so a more permanent body or identity is formed by the transformation of sensory experience into a body or identity that has connections with the unchanging and eternal. Buddhism calls this the diamond body, the imperishable self.
We can glimpse the meaning and possibility of this by once more looking into everyday life. At some point in human history an individual must have realised how to count. This realisation could be passed on to other people. They in turn developed it until we have the incredibly subtle knowledge of mathematics available today. This knowledge, the concepts of mathematics, preceded your own personal existence. It will also survive your own physical demise. In this sense it has a subtle life of its own, transcending the individual lives of those who first realised it, and also those of us who now learn it and perhaps develop it further.
As one meets the deeper levels of the unconscious a similar experience of self emerges. The identity we know is seen to be something that has emerged from countless lives lived in the past, the essence of which has given us shape and form. This is precisely the same as we meet in language. The language we take for granted is the result of thousands of years in which individuals, cultures and groups contributed their concepts, passions and wisdom to form new words. The words we use are living connections with the past, and if we investigate them unfold their history. Similarly, as we meet the deeper levels of self we find our own personal connections with the past. The difference is that the connections we meet in the deeper levels of self are living and profoundly felt.
In confronting this awareness of what contributes to our individual existence we cannot help but be transformed in some measure. The limited viewpoint of life we had drops away. A more inclusive and deeply centred viewpoint arises. In some manner you also meet with the realisation that all that has ever lived, and all and everybody that exists today, is alive at the core of your being. (See Creativity – Doorway to the Wonderful Fire).
This incredible background to personal life is so vast and inclusive, and holds so many wonders, that when we meet it, it becomes apparent that this is what many people have called God. It presents another of the paradoxes we find in this experience beyond opposites. It is both impersonal and yet we can have a personal relationship with it, experiencing direct communication. It is this real life beyond the limitations of our sensory experience and limited waking self, which is indicated by the word spiritual or spirit.
However, this is not the fundamental level of being. The causeless cause, the self-existent centre of us, when we find it, is seen to be one and the same as the origin of the physical universe.
In brief, our present theory of the emergence of the cosmos is that there existed what has been called a Singularity. From this emerged what is known as the Big Bang. One commentator describes our understanding of this as follows:
Because scientists cannot look back in time beyond that early epoch, the actual big bang is hidden from them. There is no way at present to detect the origin of the universe. Further, the big bang theory does not explain what existed before the big bang. Time and space began at the big bang, so that it makes no sense to discuss what happened “before” the big bang from a consciousness locked in a sense of time and space. (2)
As is suggested, it is understood that time and space was actually created during the Big Bang. So what existed prior to the big Bang is known to be beyond our concepts of time and space. Because of this we cannot even think about it because our concepts are all formed around our experience of time, space and individual existence. This is exactly what we meet when we touch that indefinable core of our being. It is impossible to reason about this experience or in any way to describe it. One translation of the Tao Te Ching, an ancient Chinese classic about the foundation of existence, says that ‘The Tao that can be named is not the Tao.’
Who am I?
One of the main constituents of what we call ‘me’ or myself, is identification. Although our sense of self seems so concrete and definite, if we turn attention back on it the creature we call self is a very slippery customer to get hold of. What does seem obvious as we make the journey to our core self, is that the body sensations, the thoughts, the emotions felt, and the image we have of ourselves, are identified with so deeply, that most people take them to be who they are. They believe their body is who they are; or their thoughts are what constitutes their real being, or their emotions or sexual experience are what they identify with. However, one can lose limbs, or even be paralysed and still have a sense of self. You can be sterilised and so lose your sexual self -and yet you still exist. And if you gradually ‘undress’ yourself of all these things – imaginatively take away hearing, remove visual impression and body sensations – you still have a sense of self without them. Dreams make this very clear. Without the senses being active, without sight, without body sensations, you still dream and have a sense of existing. Usually though, even in dreams you clothe yourself in the usual trapping of the three dimensional body life of waking awareness.
When we approach our core awareness it is like undressing. We lose body awareness if we do it while asleep. We pass through the realm of thought governed by language – so we lose thoughts. We lose all the things consciousness ‘clothes’ itself in while awake – yet we still exist. It is a very different form of existence, beyond the limitations of the body, and even time and space, but we still exist as an incredible creature alive in a world with almost no boundaries. We are godlike. In fact it seems to many when they experience this, that they are meeting God – in fact they are God.
This Core experience is often described as enlightenment. It can also be described as naked awareness. This is because what we usually know of self has become “undressed”. What that means is that what we usually call self has dropped away.
This dropping away of self is what had been called ‘enlightenment’. However, there is enormous confusion about this, as what some people who have touched it say is that you are left with no self. They say this sometimes almost like a threat – “Go there and you will lose everything. You will no longer exist.”
I see this as an incomplete process of meeting and integrating the polarity of the Core. Certainly the self that we believed we were from our sense impressions and our almost total identification with our body, thoughts, emotions and sexual feelings drops away. But what such statements fail to tell is that the Core is EVERYTHING. An unimaginable amount is added, and in the end nothing is taken away. You still have your body sensations, you can still make love with even more wonder, you have your thoughts, your emotions, you can still love and laugh and carry on with life – you simply do not identify with them as fully as you did. The concepts and sense of self arising from them is seen as limiting.
Also, one great fact that is almost never mentioned, is that the formless and the formed are not separate. They co-exist at the same time. To gain one is not to lose the other. It is part of that huge paradox that is life.
Beyond Time and Space
This opening to naked awareness, can, when healthy and adjusted to, be recognised as an expanded awareness, an unconditional love, and a deep understanding and compassion for the human condition. The limitations of time and space have fallen away to some extent.
So the past, present and future are all here and now. In terms of waking awareness, this means the person will often know something of the future, and of the past – the far past. The boundaries between themselves and other people have also to some extent fallen away, so they frequently know very much what is going on in another person’s mind and feelings. (Witness the life of Swedenborg and Edgar Cayce).
When this transcendence of time and space, and its boundaries, are very marked in the person, they express extraordinary genius and great creativity. They often demonstrate a multitude of abilities, as for instance seen in somebody like Rudolph Steiner. Whoever the author of the Shakespeare plays was, the enormous insight into human nature and the wonderful creativity, suggest he had transcended the usual boundaries of self. Wouldn’t you know a great deal more, express a great deal more, if you had transcended the boundaries of time and space, knowing as you would your core self – a self that is at the same time the core of the universe?
Of course there are all stages in between normal waking awareness bounded by the body and sense impressions, and the boundless self of naked awareness. It is a new and emerging possibility for our race, and many people only reach it either in a maladjusted form, or in small degree in a sort of psychism.
To achieve it reasonably fully in waking awareness does not make a mystic or peculiar human of you. Self awareness is fairly new to the human species. Being self awareness has an enormous range of ways it is expressed – from criminal to genius. This is also true of achieving the Core experience. Touching your core does not make of you an all wise guru. The experience is new and unstable in our species as yet. But if you achieve it you are no less human than someone who has achieved self awareness. Maurice Bucke, in his major work Cosmic Consciousness, spelt all this out in 1863.
In meeting this core however, there is something we do know. We know that everything has emerged from that Core, and all will fall back into it. The changing changes and passes away – the changeless remains pouring forth change.
(1) See LSD Psychotherapy by W. D. Caldwell: The Tao of Physics, by Fritjof Capra; Myself and I. by Constance Newland; Realms of the Human Unconscious By Stanislav Grof; and LSD – The Problem Solving Psychedelic by P. G. Stafford and B. H. Golightly.
(2) “Big Bang Theory,” Microsoft® Encarta® 98 Encyclopedia. © 1993-1997 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Collective Consciousness – The Dawn of Awareness
Dreams are an expression of biological life forming a dim awareness of itself, an ill-defined awareness as it came alive in the creatures swarming on our planet. Life became conscious in that way millions of years ago. From the human point of view we do not see it as a powerful form of consciousness. But the focused self-aware consciousness of human beings feeds back into that unfocused ocean of awareness because we are a connected part of it. That fundamental awareness, or what the Australian aborigines call the Dreamtime, and what a lot of people probably mean when they use the word God, is transforming constantly through the impact of new experience. This transformation comes about through an interaction between the focused self-awareness of human beings and that fundamental awareness behind existence. That core awareness is archaic and ancient, a collective experience of everything that has lived. That core awareness is unfocused, but in that is its wonder. It doesn’t particularise. It doesn’t end up being any one thing. It remains all encompassing, a collective. Because of the interaction between physical life forms and that core awareness it is evolving all the time.
All that life has learned is now a great matrix of influence that continues to flow into the way things work, and who we are. This is like an enormous structure that directs things and holds them to that pattern. I suppose this could be seen as a sort of establishment – what is established. But this would not be a real insight into that collective awareness. Because all the time, in a sort of flashing newness of creativity the collective awareness constantly upgrades, it constantly experiments, it constantly tries out new things. It does this because of the factor of randomness, because an aspect of the universe and life is chaotic, and it has through that a freedom to do the unexpected. And Life integrates what it learns.
Life learned how to build, how to develop an integrated system. The lesson was learned slowly, but it was unfolded from the already existing building blocks or framework that formed the universe. Integration means connectivity. It means symbiosis, working together for mutual gain. It means love in its most profound sense – the giving of self to another as happens in pregnancy and child rearing; as happens in life where to survive we live on the death of other things such as when we eat plants or animals. All that life has learned is now a great matrix of influence that continues to flow into the way things work, and who we are. This is like an enormous structure that directs things and holds them to that pattern. I suppose this could be seen as a sort of establishment – what is established. But this would not be a real insight into that collective awareness. Because all the time, in a sort of flashing newness of creativity the collective awareness constantly upgrades, it constantly experiments, it constantly tries out new things. And it integrates what it learns.
Human society with its immense variety, it is enormous range of experience, its conflicts, its pain and challenges, is the most amazing source of experience and experiment. It constantly presents variety and opportunity to try out new things. And I saw that life is learning about energy exchange, about shifts, about not holding on. Or perhaps it has learned that and it is offering that as possible behavioural responses to us human beings. In any case, for me personally, I saw that I do not need to hold on to any particular form of relationship. One of the most powerful stances we can take is that of balance. Not holding on to the shifting experiences we meet is the balance that allows us to move and shift according to this moment, this need, this person we are dealing with now.
I saw that dreams express an archaic wisdom. They express that wisdom mentioned above that the collective awareness has gathered through unimaginable variety of life experience. It expresses the possibility of all the behavioural responses that it has learned. For instance, in human society there are all manner of relationship between the man and the woman. There are men with one wife, no wife, or many wives. There are men who never enter a relationship all their life. There are women with no husband, with one husband, with several husbands, or several partners. Of course the unusual forms of sexuality such as prostitution and homosexuality explore yet more varieties of personal experience. It isn’t that any of these are right or wrong, they are simply variations on a theme. As in music that satisfies, the theme may explore conflicts, pain, or discord as the music moves toward integration, toward synthesis and satisfaction.
It is not only genetic coding that influences us to respond to present events. There is also an experience that lies behind that coding. There are the millions of years of life experience that led to the code. The archaic in us exists because of connections. The whole matrix of life exists because of connections. Many of these are obvious as we see in the food chain, as we see in the relationship between plant life and the sun and the earth. We see these connections in the way that bacterial life and plant life and human life work together. One thing relates to and depends upon another thing. At a deep level we all acknowledge that dependence. We feel it as a sort of holiness or awe. We see it as a fundamental truth but unfortunately often ignore it.
Our tribal religions frequently, and unfortunately, get disconnected from that archaic source of life. The religion, although it states it is about the creative impulse in us all, often doesn’t help us to connect with that creative source, with that internal archaic awareness. So dreams, and the love that people have for each other, are always a more direct route to re-connection. They take us back to that wisdom, that tried and true experience. They arouse again the awareness of our connection with each other.
Some things life has learned are fundamental. Of course the collective consciousness has experience of all types of human relationship. That core experience knows that it is only out of the death of one life form that another exists. It is only by acknowledging and living our place in the scheme of things that we keep our own connection with that core of awareness open. In that way we maintain our integrity and growth. Each of us, from our forebears, from the circumstances of our birth and culture, through pain or wonder experienced, have achieved a particular shape or personality structure. Being that shape, we do not need to conform to somebody else’s shape or requirements. It is the variety that the core awareness treasures and absorbs. Our particular shape has its own qualities and weaknesses. What does need to happen though, is that we need to stand openly, as the shape we are, before that fundamental awareness. We need to bring ourselves just as we are to that connection with life so that it may experience us more fully. In that connection we share with it, and it shares with us. It savours us, and we savour it. If we feel guilty or attempt to hide parts of ourselves, then we remain unwhole. Unwhole in the sense that part of our nature is the core awareness. If we lack that we are only a fraction of what we might be. We are the odd shape we have become. With our core connection we are whole no matter what shape we are. Without that connection we remain separated and alone. See You Are a Dual Being
Certain things are holy, like motherhood, or fatherhood. They are holy because they are so fundamental to life as it expresses on our planet. Marriage is such a holy thing because it represents and is an expression of the wonder of reproduction and parenthood. This should not be confused with partnership, such as occurs in a homosexual relationship.(1) Because things such as marriage, that manifest the most primordial aspects of life, are holy we need to honour them, and perhaps kneel before them in some way. They transcend any one person’s life and experience. Because of this, things like motherhood develop into an immense archetype. In other words they become a focused collection of uncountable human experiences. All such huge areas of experience are patterns in the core awareness. They are immense patterns in the internal structure of human life. And although life itself honours them, although life itself largely flows through the patterns they are, life does not stop us making leaps right beyond the boundaries of those archetypes. In that way we make new connections new possibilities for life itself and for the environment.
() That is not to say that a homosexual relationship does not express another of the most profound aspects of life, that of love. But love should be seen as a transcending influence rather than simply a genital desire or an expression of need or dependence.
See Sorg.
The Significance of Infant Bonding in the Development of Self and Relationships
As It Was In The Beginning
By Marjorie L. Rand, Ph.D.
Marjorie Rand,Ph.D., is a psychotherapist and one of the founders of Integrative Body Psychotherapy. She holds licenses in three states. As an InternationalDirector of thirteen IBP Institutes Dr. Rand trains and supervises therapists in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Israel. She is co-author of “Body, Self & Soul: Sustaining Integration” and lectures on pre- and perinatal psychology and health.
Abstract:
For many years, psychologists have speculated about the influence of early bonding experiences upon subsequent development. In this article, one of the pioneers of body psychotherapy considers recent research. in the field of pre- and perinatal psychology to suggest how infant bonding might have a profound effect on the/ emergence of Self and relationships. Implications and methods of practice are described and discussed.
Bonding or Bondage?
Through direct involvement in the lives of children, most child and youth care practitioners tend to view each individual life as a unique blend of personal essence, developmental needs, and contextual conditions.
With experience, however, few can fail to notice the appearance and re-appearance of common patterns that seem to emerge, not only within individual lives but across the kaleidoscope of the childhood experience. Those who remain curious often find themse lves probing deeper into each scenario and reaching further and further back into the experiential history of each child, looking for some general propositions that might account for such consistencies.
This article, drawn from the traditions of Integrative Body Psychotherapy (Rosenberg, Rand, & Asay, 1985), is based upon three such propositions: (a) that each child brings a unique essence of Self into the world; (b) that the child’s developing sense of Self-in-the-world is formed within the context of primary relationships; and (c) that this process begins well before the development of cognitive and intellectual capacities.
All of this implies that patterns showing through individual and situational variables may be traced back to these primary processes and that growth, change, and healing may not occur until these deeper issues are addressed.
In Integrative Body Psychotherapy (IBP) the goal is to reach the essential Self, or the essence with which we are all born. People who are connected to this experience of Self from the beginning will always have a place to go–on the inside. With this co nnection they are instinctively functional, able to feel, to move from the known to the unknown, to face change without fear. They are responsive rather than reactive, are creative and receptive, incorporating the heart and the emotions. They are balanced, maintaining a sense of trust and self esteem.
The origin of this experience appears to be located within the process of primary bonding. It now seems clear that bonding begins before birth!
Recent research in pre- and perinatal psychology is pushing the origins of consciousness earlier and earlier (e.g., Chamberlain, 1994; Emerson, 1989; Verny, 1981). How the infant bonds becomes the blueprint for all future relationships. Therefore, it is imperative to return to the original imprint in order to understand, heal, and reconnect with the essential Self. The evidence firmly suggests that the original imprint is to be found within the prenatal period of development.
Bonding means love and the absence of fear. Bonding creates connection and safety. It allows the infant to experience the world as a friendly place. If bonding doesn’t occur, the connections to Self, Other, and the rest of the world become fragile and unsafe. Poorly bonded people are generally insecure, locked into hindsight, and vigilantly trying to control, predict and anticipate. They feel powerless and afraid of the unknown. They do not want to be questioned, yet they always have an answer, know how to do things, and consider themselves to be always right. They both dominate and cling: using and abusing to meet their own needs. They live their lives on alert, trusting only in their own defenses. For them, love and intimacy become fearful.
When someone else moves close, they find excuses to distance themselves (not too close, not too far away).
Recent research has shown that the lack of bonding (skin contact, sensual stimulation, etc.) leads to shutting down the emotional (right) hemisphere of the brain, leaving people to live in the thinking (left) hemisphere. This could, perhaps, be the ori gin of the mind/body split. When people live from their head, rather than their emotional center, they are driven to figure out how to cope and how to get by. Most of all, they have to figure out what the other person wants – constantly looking to the outside because they are split off from the inside. In IBP terminology, this is referred to as “Agency,” or more accurately, “Other-Agency.” In this condition, the person lives his or her life according to the perceived needs of others and thereby closes off from the nutritional and expressive needs of the Self.
Along with the emergence of “agency,” each individual also develops his or her own configuration of defenses, or “character style.” These more general characteristics, usually thought of in terms of “personality,” may also be traced back to the birth and bonding periods of development. In IBP terms, the foundations of “character style” are formed when the infant in trauma has no choice but to split off from the body. Hence, the original injury may become trapped in the body or, in later stages of development, a false Self may be created on top of the pain. Here we are not talking about trauma as a rare occurrence but as common response to the birthing and bonding process. This becomes increasingly apparent the more we examine the pre and perinatal experience from the infant’s perspective.
Given the compelling evidence that the in-utero infant is a conscious and aware being, how might the unwanted child respond to such parental messages? What about the child whose very existence has been threatened by an attempted abortion? Or, at birth, what happens when the mother is simply “absent” through medication or when the child looks into another pair of eyes that show no sign of recognition or welcome? Infants cannot contain such feelings – they are too overwhelming so they develop defenses in order to survive. And while these defenses might provide th e necessary protection at the outset, they fail to serve the growing child and the emerging adult. Because these patterns are established long before cognitive or intellectual processes develop, they are not amenable to change through talk or insight. They are literally locked into the body and held at a cellular level. In terms of traditional psychotherapy, they might be considered to be “pathological.”
Birth and prenatal work is the way to release these pathological ways of surviving. Certainly other forms of childhood trauma may create some pathology, but if you start with good bonding, a good birth experience, being wanted and connected, it is possible to recreate the trust necessary to emerge from the traumatic experience. Clinical evidence clearly suggests that individuals who have a birth or bonding injury respond to subsequent trauma by resuming to their original trauma and acting it out as they did at the pre-verbal stage. They go back to the original imprint, be it anger, frustration, depression, or agency.
At its essence, bonding is a biological need. Most professionals are familiar with the research demonstrating our need for touch. Recent experiments using massage with premature babies shows that they gain weight faster and are able to leave the hospital sooner than babies who do not receive massages. Bonding occurs during a critical period that is probably hormonal Most important is the first hour after birth. Beyond this, the evidence suggests that during the first eight days of a person’s life, a relationship pattern emerges that lasts a lifetime. This does not mean that bonding cannot happen later, but, if the hormonal factor is interfered with by drugs or other problems, that interference significantly hampers the bonding process.
It is through the body of the mother that the baby gets its first sensory contact relationship with others and thus with the world. Prenatal bonding injuries consist of not being wanted, communicated with, or celebrated. Very often, the uterus is experienced as toxic owing to prior unresolved traumas such as miscarriages and abortions, as well as physical toxicity from drugs and other contaminants. If there has been a miscarriage and the mother does not grieve that loss, it will in some way contribute to her belief and fear that she will lose another child. In clinical work, clients will often remember abortion attempts from their own in-utero experiences. Sometimes the images occur in dreams along with feelings that someone is trying to kill them. When they try to verify or validate such experiences, they are often told by their mothers, “I never told anyone. How did you know?”
But the child does know, and the memory is recorded in the body. And further, these things that we are not supposed to know or feel limit us. Some women refuse to admit that they are pregnant, resulting in the infant feeling ignored and not wanted. If, on the other hand, a woman is happy about being pregnant, takes care of herself, talks to her baby, then a loving prenatal bond is created. Mothers need the love and support of the father, who should also be encouraged to participate in this prenatal communication. The baby recognizes these communications, not for their verbal content but for the energy that is conveyed. F or this reason, it is helpful for a woman to work on her own birth, even before she becomes pregnant. Without awareness, she can in effect communicate her own issues surrounding birth to the developing child at a cellular level. Working through issues aro und the relationship with her own mother can also be a critical part of this preparation.
Standard hospital procedures often create a lack of bonding. For instance, the epidural anesthetic (the current procedure of choice) does not stop contractions although it does slow them down. Although the mother might not feel the contractions, the baby does. If the mother is anaesthetized, it will blunt the hormones in her body that provide an essential biological bond. This in itself creates an energetic mismatc h, or lack of attunement, between the two of them. Anything that creates fear jeopardizes bonding. In all of this, the presence of the father as a participant throughout the birthing can play a vital role in ensuring that the newborn feels welcome, celebrated, and subsequently attached.
The baby should be held by the mother immediately after birth. If she does not see the baby when it is born, this will also disrupt bonding. The cord should not be cut prematurely, as all the senses are activated . Skin and eye contact, soothing sounds, and smiles are all necessary for optimal bonding to occur at this time. This means, of course, that the mother must be fully present and aware. Bonding is a two-way street. Parents who have not been bonded as children often find it difficult to be “there” for the newborn. In later life they tend to abuse, neglect, and abandon their own children.
To enhance bonding there must be extended periods of contact between mother, father, and baby. If there is support for the mother and she feels that she has the power to care for her baby, then bonding will continue to be enhanced. If breastfeeding starts right away, the mother’s instincts and hormones will promote bonding as nature intended.
Unfortunately, this critical issue of bonding is often overlooked by professionals who work with children, as well as by those working with adults and families. Given recent advances in the field of pre- and perinatal psychology, the implications of this oversight might well be m onumental. One thing, at least seems clear. People who do not become bonded in early infancy spend the rest of their lives looking for it, one way or another. Unfortunately, most people in our society find substitutes in their intellects or in material things. From this perspective it really does seem that lack of bonding serves to create a life of bondage.
Integrative Body Psychotherapy with Infants and Parents
There is nothing new in the idea that prenatal and birth experiences are primary influences in the formation of character defenses (e.g., Grof, 1975; Janov, 1970), but until recently most of the therapeutic methods associated with this perspective worked only with adults. More recently the pioneering work exemplified by Dr. William Emerson (1991) has opened up new opportunities to work with infants and parents on issues of birth trauma as early as possible after the event. Some of this work has also been distinctly preventative in nature, working with couples prior to conception and during pregnancy to interrupt and alter repetitive multi-generational patterns.
One of the most exciting developments in this area has been a creative and fortuitous combination of IBP methods with the ground-breaking work conducted by Emerson (1996) and his colleagues. Because the earliest trauma is buried deepest in the body, working with an infant whose trauma is still recent and more accessible allows for the creation of change that will affect an entire lifetime. Infants are nothing process and there is nothing for them but the present. Their only history is their intrauterine life and their birth experience. With special attention to boundaries (in infants they are diffused), it is possible to work with bonding injuries before trauma becomes set in rigid defense systems.
As a psychotherapeutic system, IBP works with the concepts of presence, containment, boundaries, mirroring, empathy, and the body as an energetic system. These concepts and tools are ideally formulated for working with children and parents on issues rela ting to early trauma and bonding. Bonding, along with its attendant injuries, is the essential developmental task. “Bonding is the process by which parent and infant become connected, intimate and attached to each other. Bonding is a dialogue between parent and child that begins even before birth and continues for a lifetime” (Paris and Paris, 1992). It creates the energy that sustains human compassion and understanding. In the bonded relationship, safety, survival needs, and deep acknowledgment of a common knowing are internalized. Bonding leads to self- actualization and relational autonomy. But without respect and empathy for the pre-born and newborn’s boundaries and inner being, bonding cannot take place. This, then, must be the therapeutic stance taken in working with infants and their parents.
From an IBP perspective, the primary intention is to connect the Self of the infant with its experience. In this context, the term “Self” is used to describe the coherence of the infant’s subjective experience described by Daniel Stern (1985). The focus is not about strategy, technique, or symptom removal. The primary healing aspect of the work is relational, not technical, and the success of treatment depends upon the quality of those relationships. The therapist’s job is to observe, hear, see, sense, and reflect the experience of the infant in other words, to “mirror” that experience. Mirroring is the skill of putting words to the non-verbal experience of the infant. Accurate mirroring will help infants to discover their feelings and thus to discover themselves. When mirroring in this way, the words are not as important as the tone of voice and the emotional energy conveyed to the infant. Together, the energetic presence of the therapists and the parents is corrective because during the infant’s birth, the parents may not have been emotionally and energetically present. Both therapist and parents must now be present and connected to their own bodies and emotions in order to be fully there and empathic.
According to the basic principles of IBP, catharsis does little to eliminate trauma. In fact, clinical experience suggests that unrestrained cathartic release may well create the conditions for re-injury. The concept of “containment,” on the other hand, implies the ability to experience what is happening in the body with awareness and being able to tolerate one’s direct experience without moving into defensive styles or discharge. Containment improves contact between parents or therapist and infant while promoting the resolution of trauma and eventual integration. In the words of William Emerson, “Healing depends on the extent to which infants or children remember, express and/or re-live their traumas, and on the degree to which understanding, compassion and empathy is extended to them during the treatment process” (1984).
The notion of “boundaries” implies safety and respect. Infants and children are dependent upon others knowing, recognizing, and honoring their boundaries. The therapist should attend to the infant’s responses and follow the baby as she/he sets boundaries by vocally or physically expressing “no” or “yes.” Given the sensitivity of the adults, the baby will generally respond to the intentions of those present, as well as the spoken word, direct touch, and energetic contact. Although the infant is undoubtedly non-verbal, it is worth keeping in mind that approximately 75 percent of all human communication is actually non-verbal. As in working with adults, the purpose of the boundary is to meet the other person, not to do something or perform a technique. In this particular case, it is important for the therapist to have worked on his or her own birth trauma or it will be stimulated, producing a loss of boundaries along with counter-transferential issues. While it is important to support defenses (saying “no”), at tention to boundaries will gradually replace defenses and allow re-patterning, healing, and integration, resulting in freedom and choice.
In this sense, the essential process is no different than that supported by the therapists in any other clinical context. The body component in working with infants is energy work\emdash near touch and touch–always starting with the least invasive method. From this perspective, the organism is considered to be an energy field. In the newborn, the boundaries are so diffuse that all trauma and shock is recorded in the energy field and in the body. Because placing one’s hand in the energy field of an infant is to touch the mind and emotions of the baby, how it is touched and who touches it can have either traumatic or healing effects. Trauma sites can be located in the energy field. Observation of the infant’s responses will show where the trauma sites are and what emotions are involved. Patterns of energy flow and movement are blocked according to the degree of trauma. The physical body expresses the impact of trauma in movement, structure, function, behavior, and emotional expression of the newborn. Pressures on the body during the birth process impact the infant. Re-stimulation of these pressures on the body can re-activate the trauma. As William Emerson (1994) has demonstrated, the release process must be done in stages, as there are no effective defenses.
In introducing this work to infants and parents, experience suggests that the therapist should spend time in demystifying birth trauma. It is important to point out that many infants (perhaps most) experience some form of trauma in entering this world. Sharing information and modeling empathy are important preparatory moves. In addition, the therapist should help the parents to understand the normal needs and communication of babies. The role of the therapist is to work with the trauma and to teach the parents how to work with the trauma. During the work, the parents should allow the baby to cry and empathize with the feelings being expressed. In this way, the interruption to the initial bond during the original birthing process is addressed. The therapist should set boundaries with the infant and the parents by always giving them permission to stop at any time. The infant always leads the sessions. The infant will choose when to work on trauma and when to stop and nurse or be nurtured.
While many therapists, counselors, and child and youth professionals may never work directly with infants, the issues of birth trauma and bonding have clear implications for practitioners who deal with a broad range of behavioral, emotional, and relational issues presented by children and adults. Understanding how intrauterine life, birth trauma, and early bonding can create patterns that last a lifetime can assist in orienting practitioners toward the lives of their clients. Replacing intrusive, coercive, and potentially harmful techniques with such approaches as expressive empathy, treating and respecting boundaries, and accurate mirroring are more likely to offer clients a connection with Self rather than create an experience of frustration and possible re-injury. Of course the work described in the latter part of this article calls for extensive training, but the clinical experiences of the handful of practitioners currently working in this area will undoubtedly continue to enhance our appreciation of the pre- and perinatal experience along with our understanding of the persistence of those problematic patterns that seem to beset the lives of both ourselves and our clients.
References
Chamberlain, D. (1994). How pre- and perinatal psychology can transform the world. Pre- and Perinatal Psychology Journal, (3), 187-199.
Emerson, W. (1984). Unpublished manuscript.
Emerson, W. (1989). Psychotherapy with infants and children. Pre- and Perinatal Psychology Journal 3(3), 190-217.
Emerson, W. (1991). Maximizing human potential in infants and children. Paper presented to the Fifth international Congress on Pre- and Perinatal Psychology, Atlanta, GA.
Emerson, W. (1994, October). Demonstration videotape.
Emerson, W. (1996). The vulnerable prenate. Pre- and Perinatal Psychology Journal 10(3), 12-130.
Grof, S. (1975). Realms of the Human Unconscious. New York: E.P. Dutton.
Janov, A. (1970). The Primal Scream. New York: Putnam.
Paris, T., & Paris E. (1992). I’ll never do to mykids what my parents did to me. Chicago: Contemporary Books.
Rosenberg, J., Rand, M., and Asay, D. (1985). Body, Self & Soul: Sustaining integration. Atlanta: Humanics Ltd.
Stern, D. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
Verny, T. with Kelley, J. (1986). The Secret Life of the Unborn Child. New York: Dell.
(This article was first published in Journal of Child and Youth Care (1996), Vol 10 (4), 1-8. Reprinted with permission.
